Summer heating up for Booker hopefuls
Reviewed by Nadine O’Regan
Summertime by JM Coetzee (Harvill Secker, €20)
Love and Summer by William Trevor (Viking, €22)
The long-listing of William Trevor and JM Coetzee for the Booker Prize last month could hardly have come as a surprise to literary fiction fans. Though their novels hadn’t yet been published when the announcement was made, the authors’ pedigree is world-class – Cork-born Trevor has won the Whitbread Award three times; and in 2003, South African-born Coetzee took home the Nobel Prize for Literature.
Like their American rival Philip Roth, Trevor and Coetzee have moved into the late phase of their careers – Coetzee is 69,Trevor is 81 – with striking ease, continuing to write with uncommon insight, vitality and passion. There is great truth in their visions, and none can hide before the steady, piercing quality of their gaze. The darkness and thrum of menace in both men’s work is often striking – though Coetzee is the far more political of the two; the more troubled, rootless, questioning author.
In Summertime, Coetzee has produced a fictionalised memoir – the completion of a trilogy that began with Boyhood – that is intellectually rigorous and challenging – and extremely rewarding to read, particularly if you’re already a Coetzee fan.
The structure of the book is simple, but subversively original. A young English biographer is gathering together material for a book about the deceased writer John Coetzee. Focusing on the years 1972-1977, when Coetzee was in his 30s, the biographer interviews a number of people who knew Coetzee: his favourite cousin Margot; a Brazilian dancer; a married woman with whom he had an affair; and some of his friends and colleagues.
They describe him variously as cold, awkward, occasionally funny, heartless, flat-footed, sexless, a man who ‘‘looked out of place, like one of those flightless birds’’. To a striking extent, Coetzee uses the voices of other characters in this book as a stick to beat himself with, and also as an opportunity to present himself – perhaps – as he really is: a diffident, awkward individual, a man who longs to be a romantic or an existentialist, but lacks the natural capacity to be either: ‘‘It was all just an idea in his head, not an urge rooted in his body.”
Towards the end of the book, the Brazilian dancer Adriana speaks frankly of her feelings about Coetzee. ‘‘Tell me, am I wrong about John Coetzee? Was he really a great writer? Because to my mind, a talent for words is not enough if you want to be a great writer. You have also to be a great man. And he was not a great man. He was a little man, an unimportant man.”
Her comments cut to the core of this book. Coetzee seems to question the validity of the towering reputation he has amassed, and the writing enterprise itself. Or could he be undermining himself to counteract the natural conceit involved in producing a memoir? Reclusive by nature and media-shy as Coetzee is, it’s impossible to know – and an internet search to acquire further detail turns up more questions than answers.
The degree of truth contained in this fictionalised memoir is also impossible to judge. Are any or all of these characters real?
Very possibly. Either way, the effects of the narrative decisions he has made are fascinating and haunting. In Coetzee’s fiction – I’d recommend in particular Life & Times of Michael K( 1983),Age of Iron (1990) and Disgrace (1999) – what comes through most strongly is his characters’ sense of anguish: they long to feel, to love, to be natural – but these ambitions are beyond them, flitting out of their grasp.
Continue Reading »